트위터 페이스북 미투데이

Search Article

읽은기사 0
no img
   현재위치 : HOME >   >  
   미술시장의 동향 / 미술 투자 / 미술품 경매   
This Is Why I Hate Big-Money Art Auctions

/   www.ulture.com   /   2012. 5. 10.
This Is Why I Hate Big-Money Art Auctions

NEW YORK, NY - MAY 02:   Edvard Munch's 'The Scream' is auctioned at Sotheby's May 2012 Sales of Impressionist, Modern and Contemporary Art on May 2, 2012 in New York City. The masterpiece is one of four versions created by Munch and the only one that is privately owned. The masterpiece sold for over $119 million.   (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

I hate art auctions. Not just because they're freak-show legal casinos, spectacles where the Über-ultrarich can act out as profligately in public as possible, trying to buy immortality, become a part of art history, make headlines, and create profit. I don't only hate them because they may be the whitest sector in the entire world. I hate them for what they do to art, for the bad magic of making mysterious powerful things turn into numbers.

Last night, after being touted in the lamestream media as potentially the "most expensive painting ever," Edward Munch's 1895 pastel The Scream came up on the auction block. The whole event amounted to about ten minutes of back-and-forth banter, during which the theatrical Sotheby's auctioneer Tobias Meyer tempted the fates by cooing, "I've got all the time in the world." (I had such a vision of Wotan sweeping him up and whisking him off to the underworld right there!) With dapper white men and tall, thin white women making little finger signals while holding phones, speaking to strangers in Dubai or Russia or Beijing or Mitt Romney's garage, the painting was sold "to an unknown telephone bidder" for $119.5 million. Thus, a great work of art that had been all but lost to us, hanging in a private Norwegian home for more than a century, made a brief public appearance and then was sold off to another private owner, probably to disappear for another 100 years. We will likely never see this work of art again in our lifetimes. The Scream is a part of art history and should hang in a public collection, probably in Norway, and not just decorate a California den or a dacha in the Ukraine, waiting to be fodder for the next auction. (Needless to say, no museum was in a position to spend that kind of money.)

Many asked why The Scream would go for this much money. Who the hell knows how these things happen? I'd say the image is utterly iconic, as recognizable as the Mona Lisa or Whistler's mother (or Damien Hirst's shark). It looks and sounds and smells like the cusp of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It says, "I am a new psychology—your psychology." The Scream has attained fridge-magnet status, and anyone who looks at it can at least say, "This is art-historical art." I love The Scream because it shows Munch being modern without being Cubist, inventing Expressionism, exploring new ideas about color, composition, culture, society, cities, nature, drawing, and touch. We see a figure between worlds, suspended between earth and the unknown, wide-eyed, unable to hear us because his hands block his ears, even as he opens his mouth in a scream he can't hear himself. This is being inside and outside at the same time. The sky lights up; alienation blazes. It's fabulous and prophetic. And, now, gone again.

Auction houses run a rigged game. They know exactly how many people will be bidding on a work and exactly who they are. In a gallery, works of art need only one person who wants to pay for them. Auctions jigger the rules in one tiny way: They have two people who want something, and they know how high each is willing to go. The setup is simple and perfect. The auctioneer simply waits until he gets around the ceiling he knows these two clients are willing to go to; then he pits the two bidders against one another. Voilà! Money. Last night, Meyer knew that two people were ready to surpass $100 million. He got them there, said he had "all the time in the world," kept them going up, waited for one to blink, and banged his gavel. Doing this publicly instead of in private just means that more people see what happened and want to try playing the game (not knowing or not caring that it’s rigged). It’s advertising for the next auction: Whole new client markets open, and entirely new material now lures these players in. Now other Expressionist works at lesser prices will be put into play. And I'll end up on the Charlie Rose morning show again, this time grousing about how much a Max Beckman is going to go for.

The bad magic here is that people can no longer see this work as a painting. Now people look at The Scream or Van Gogh’s Irises or a Picasso and see its new content: money. Auction houses inherently equate capital with value. The price of a work of art has nothing to do with what the work of art is, can do, or is worth on an existential, alchemical level. The closest I come to wanting out of contemporary art is when I look at the auction trade. A pox on their houses.

기사 보관함 :   
       ◆ 관 련 된 기 사 보 기
       ◆ 기 사 관 련 문 의
해당 기사의 질문이 없습니다.
       ◆ 저 작 권 에 대 하 여
ARTne를 이용하는 분들은 아래에 내용을 반드시 준수하여 주세요
- 이 사이트의 이용자는 ARTne의 사전 허락이나 허가 없이 어떠한 매체에도 직,간접적으로 변조, 복사, 배포, 출판, 판매하거나 상품제작, 인터넷, 모바일 및 데이터베이스를 비롯한 각종 정보서비스 등에 사용하는 것을 금합니다.

- 이 서비스의 이용자 즉, 회원들은 정보를 왜곡,개작,변조하지 않을 것을 확약하며 ARTne는 이를 통해 발생한 문제에 대해서는 어떠한 책임도 지지 않습니다. 또한 사전의 서면 허가 없이 ARTne의 정보를 이용하여 영리, 비영리 목적의 정보서비스, 재판매를 할 수 없습니다.

- 이 서비스를 통해 제공받은 정보의 사용은 이 웹사이트 내에서의 사용으로 제한하며 인터넷,모바일 등 전자매체로의 복사, 인쇄, 재사용을 위한 저장은 허가되지 않습니다. 단, 개인적 참조나 교육의 목적등 비영리적 사용에는 예외적으로 허용되나, 이러한 경우에도 반드시 결과물에는 출처를 "ARTne.COM"로 명시해야 합니다. (저작권이 ARTne가 아닌 경우에는 정보하단의 저작권자를 참조하여 해당 저작권자의 출처를 명시해야 합니다.)

- ARTne와 계약을 체결하여 정보서비스를 제공하는 사용자는 허가된 목적으로만 사용할 수 있습니다.


아트네는     l     이용방법안내     l     이용약관     l     개인정보정책     l     제휴안내     l     제보/투고     l     광고안내